Share this:

Legal Practice Areas

Is It Worth Hiring An Attorney For A DUI Charge in Omaha

Attorneys in Omaha, NE

If you’ve been arrested for a DUI and are facing charges, you might be wondering if you need an attorney. The answer is absolutely yes. You’re more likely to get a better outcome when represented by a DUI attorney in Omaha, and here’s why:

1. DUI Attorneys know what works

You can learn how to do plenty of things by yourself, but working your way through a DUI charge isn’t one of them. When you’re facing a DUI charge, you don’t have time to waste figuring out how to defend yourself. Knowing the law isn’t enough.

There is more to your case than meets the eye. For example, a DUI attorney will have the experience of noticing patterns in the way judges grant and dismiss certain motions in DUI cases. Not all judges make the same decisions for the same reasons. A lawyer who has represented hundreds of DUI cases will know the patterns judges tend to follow, which gives your case an advantage you wouldn’t have on your own.

2. DUI attorneys in Omaha know the rules for evidence

An attorney will also know what types of evidence are taken more seriously, and what evidence can and can’t be presented in court. Sometimes evidence seems credible or admissible, but isn’t. A DUI lawyer won’t make the mistake of trying to present evidence that isn’t admissible or credible.

3. Dui lawyers in Omaha are trained to understand chemical tests

It’s relatively easy to learn and memorize the laws governing blood, breath, and urine tests. For example, results obtained from portable breathalyzers used by police on the side of the road are generally inadmissible as evidence. A little research reveals that these tests are designed to establish probable cause for your arrest. In most cases, the only breath test admissible as evidence during a trial is the one given at the police station. However, knowing this information  isn’t enough if you’re going to try representing yourself.

DUI attorneys are trained on the science behind chemical tests and understand how they work. They know exactly what to look for and what questions to ask to make sure a test was administered properly. They can also spot questionable results and know how to pursue claims that a chemical test result was inaccurate.

4. Fighting the results of a chemical test is difficult on your own

A DUI lawyer knows there are many false positives that can show up in chemical tests. For example, anything that chemically resembles alcohol can show up as alcohol, including medications, a variety of foods, breath fresheners, perfumes, and even non-alcoholic beverages. People with certain medical conditions can also be wrongly accused of driving under the influence of alcohol based on inaccurate breathalyzer results.

A chemical test needs to be performed accurately to produce reliable results. Several factors contribute to a test’s reliability including machine maintenance and calibration, properly trained staff members, accurate observation, and measures to prevent contamination.

When any of those factors are questionable, a DUI attorney knows exactly how to challenge the evidence and/or have that evidence suppressed so it can’t be used against you. For example, say you submitted to a blood test. If there are gaps in the chain of custody, a lawyer can request the test results to be excluded as evidence on the grounds of potential contamination.

Without a lawyer, you won’t know what you can and can’t ask to be dismissed, nor what questions to ask to verify the validity of test results.

Another issue in Omaha is the validity of certification for machines used to administer breath tests in jails. Since these tests are admissible in court, it’s critical they be in working order.

To certify a machine is working properly, a “known solution” is put into the machine and tested. However, there are concerns because the person signing off on the machines isn’t always the person who tested it. If you submitted to a breathalyzer test while in jail, the certification of the machine is another aspect of your case your DUI attorney can challenge in court.

5. Being represented by an attorney can cost you less money

Many people successfully have their DUI charges reduced to an infraction like reckless driving with alcohol. Without legal representation, it’s nearly impossible to get DUI charges reduced. If your DUI attorney gets your charge reduced, you’ll save thousands of dollars in fines, fees, and classes.

6. There’s more than one way to win a DUI case

Winning a DUI case involves more than just proving you weren’t under the influence, or your test results were inaccurate. Many DUI cases are won by proving law enforcement did not follow their legal obligations at one of many steps along the way.

A DUI lawyer thoroughly understands your rights under the U.S. Constitution, including your rights not to be subjected to unreasonable searches and seizures. Your attorney will dive right in and find out if law enforcement had the right to stop you in the first place. The officer who pulled you over will need to prove they had probable cause to pull you over for a suspected DUI. If the officer stopped you for something unrelated to a DUI, and then asked you to take some field sobriety tests, your attorney might be able to get your case dismissed.

If you took a roadside breathalyzer for the police to establish probable cause, the prosecution will need to prove the machine was working properly and had been calibrated according to Omaha law. They’ll also need to prove the officer who administrated the test was properly trained, and that all tests were administered in accordance with city and state laws.

Without a lawyer, attempting to prove proper training and administration will be nearly impossible. Doing so requires first-hand experience in the court room.

7. A Dui lawyer knows what’s supposed to happen when you don’t consent

You may have declined to take field sobriety tests including a breathalyzer. You may have also refused to consent to a blood test, but were coerced into it.

A DUI lawyer will know that in 2016, a U.S. Supreme Court ruling determined that a search warrant must be acquired to have someone’s blood drawn when they don’t consent to a blood test. This means an arresting officer will need to drive to a judge’s home no matter how late it is, to obtain a warrant before taking a suspect to a hospital to get a blood draw.

If you didn’t consent to a blood test, were forced to give a sample and no warrant was provided, your lawyer will know exactly how to present this information to the court to get the test results thrown out. Doing so could make or break your case.

Don’t risk representing yourself – contact a DUI attorney in Omaha

Don’t make the mistake of thinking you’ll be able to get DUI charges dismissed without legal representation. If you know someone who got their charges dropped and you think your situation is identical, don’t be so sure. There are always additional circumstances surrounding a DUI case that go beyond the surface. There are many ambiguities in the law that only a lawyer can understand.

Don’t waste any more time. Contact a DUI attorney today and get experienced help.

What Our Clients Say

legal service areas
legal service areas
personal injury claim

Helped me to choose which course would be best!

From day 1 Frank was able to give me several different options and helped me to choose which course would be best for me in my family law case. Everything was done quickly and without problem. I walked away from court and what seemed like a never ending battle completely satisfied with the outcome. I would recommend Frank and his firm to anyone looking for an attorney who really knows their stuff and cares about their clients.

Grace

We Answer
Your Questions About The Law

legal service areas

The short answer is yes, you should care because it’s going to affect the statute of limitations on your claim. It’s important to define what a political subdivision is that way, you know where your claim lies.

A subdivision is city, county, villages, schools, certain administrative agencies. All those are treated under the act differently. Now, if you do sustain an injury or an accident with one of those individuals that I’ve named, then you have one year from the date of your injury to file a written notice, written claim to that subdivision. If you don’t, then your claim is forever barred. Read More

That depends on you, specifically in regards to the length of time it takes for your injuries to improve, how long it takes to get to a point where we can reasonably determine what your future looks like, what additional medical care you require, the cost of such medical care and what permanent restrictions or impairments you have. Read More

The answer to that is almost universally no. The reason for that is the insurance companies like to get in early and offer you a lowball offer in the hopes that they can get you to sign a release of liability waiver. Once that happens, you’re out of luck.

The reason that they send these lowball offers is because you haven’t had a chance yet to properly evaluate your claim. You might still be treating, you might need future medical. There’s also the possibility that you’ve been permanently damaged and you need a doctor to assess that. Read More

Maximum medical improvement or MMI is the point in your injury where you’re about as good as you’re going to get which means you’re not likely to get much better and you’re not likely to get much worse.

It doesn’t mean that you’re all the way better and so for that reason, maximum medical improvement is the point at which your permanent disability benefits are determined. Read More

In order to answer that question, we have to know the specific facts of your case. A lot of factors go into the value of a workers’ compensation case.

First of all, money benefits that are paid to you are based on your wages before the accident. That amount is used then to determine both your temporary disability benefits and your permanent disability benefits. Read More

Yes, it can. In order to modify a child custody order, you have to show what’s called a material change in circumstances.

Now, simply stated what that means is something has to happen. An unanticipated change that if the judge or the parties knew about it when they made the original order, they would have decided differently. Read More

Well, it depends on two things.

First of all, who are you suing and second of all, what are you suing them for? If it’s just general negligence and you’re suing a private person or corporation, it’s four years from the date of accrual of the claim or the date of the accident. Read More

Let’s Talk!

Attorneys in Omaha, NE